Skip to main content

SOLUTION FOR WORLD ENREGY CRISIS - THE SOLAR POWER


There is no doubt that the amount of available oil under the surface of the earth will soon run out. Alternative energies have no match to the appetite to our energy consumption beside alternative energies require upfront investment, produced electricity is not constant and varies a lot and needs expensive storage batteries.

But one green energy I my opinion can be made to look promising and that is Solar Energy.
There is two major problems why solar energy can not be implemented worldwide to replace oil.

1.      There no sun at night.

2.      Expensive batteries

Every problem can be mixed, as long as we can see it as a problem. Here how we can solve the above two problems.

First of all Solar panels has to be cheap, excessively cheap and it is so, the current technology that we have allowed it so, and it’s getting cheaper and cheaper by the day. So the cost is on the solar panels, the cost comes from storing the electrons in expensive full cycle batteries for the night time or in Countries where when sun does not shine in full.

How can we get rid-off these expensive batteries?

We can get rid-off these expensive batteries the Earth always sees the Sun 24 hours a day. We can produce Solar Energy without storing it 24hours a day, on demand 24 hours / 365 by Solar Energy.

 We need to two sides of the Earth. We install solar panels on a part of the Earth that sees the Sun strongest. We need Texas big land. The land does not used for agriculture. The Land is expandable upon the consumption rate of the World. One land I can see excellent candidates for that purpose are Sahara desert and desert of Australia. The lands are inaccessible and almost useless. Sahara desert is the land we need on one 12 hour side of the Earth. We need the Australia desert for the other 12 hour side of the earth. These two lands looks at each other at opposite sides of the Earth. If there is no Sun on one side there will be on the other Side. So we will have solar panels seeing the Sun 24 hours a day will absolute the need for storage.

When dark sets in Sahara solar panels activated in Australia and begin producing energy for the world. When it’s dark in Australia Sahara provides the World with electricity. The is the cheapest way to produce electricity there will be excess solar farm that the needs that can be activated depending on the needs.

There is this new superconductive cables that will not allow any resistivity for the electrons to pass which will mean no loss of electricity from the production centre to the consumption point even though the cables running are half way around the Earth.

In this way the electricity of any country will never be self-sustained. All Countries will need to import electricity even Australia from Sahara when it’s dark. Whole world will depend on Countries of Sahara and Australia.

For this to happen all Countries must be in Peace. Where the cables running from Sahara to Europe or Australia to China to Europe then to Sahara is gonna cross from? What if one country decides not to be co-operative and pulls out jeopardising the whole integrity? One country decides to enter another countries territory and bombs all the solar farms the whole World will have deficiency.

Therefore before a Country enter to this agreement an Alliance needs to be established. An Alliance named ‘A Peace Alliance’ where all countries signed will not enter into any war, will not embark, and participate into any act of war. Still if attacked will do everything to defend itself but will not declare a war on to the Country that attacked themselves, all Countries around the World will embargo, boycott, will cease trade to the attacking Country and will make the attacking Country pay all the cost that they have damaged to the attacked Country so no Country will have any incentives to attack any other Country.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

USEFUL WEBSITES WHEN LOOKING FOR JOBS

General Citycalling.com   Indeed.co.uk/jobs Jobsite.co.uk Totaljobs.com Jobs.theguardian.com Reed.co.uk/jobs Gumtree.com/jobs Fish4.co.uk Monster.co.uk Jobs.telegraph.co.uk cv-library.co.uk glassdoor.co.uk/job brightrecruits.com/tiptop quintcareers.com/general-job-sites jobs.vivastreet.co.uk/careers jobs.trovit.co.uk jobs.independent.co.uk uk.jobrapido.com gigajob.com/en-gb jobisjob.co.uk jobstoday.co.uk myjobhelper.co.uk stepstone.com londonjobs.metro.co.uk Londonjobs.co.uk Accounting and Auditing Accountancyagejobs.com Hays.co.uk/job/accountancy-finance-jobs Myaccountancyjobs.com Morganmckinley.co.uk/accounting-jobs Efinancialcareers.co.uk Icaewjobs.com Topfinancialjobs.co.uk Badenochandclark.com Roberthalf.co.uk Michaelpage.co.uk/browse/jobs/accounting/all/all Robertwalters.co.uk/accounting&finance.html Gaapweb.com Jobs4a.com Administrative and Office ...
NATO Cyber Alliance (NATOC) - A New Threat in our Global World - These days, there are many means to attack a country, whether by militarily, politically, indiscriminately, financially and the new threat on Cyberspace. Any kind of attack on another country should still be considered as an attack and responded in same manner. A country should be able to defend itself in any form of threat. Biggest cyber threat today coming from regimes such as N. Korea and current Russia regime and what country there will be in the future. We had seen them attacking emails, secret conversation, meddling democracy, creating fake accounts, stealing virtual documents. These are all cyber attacks and should be defined as, especially if sponsored by a Government. At the moment the West doesn't have protection to counter-act that. There will be many forms of cyber attack in the future. Most our lives are more and more reliant on cyberspace, whether shopping, banking, diagnosing, secret conversat...

Why there should be a 2nd referendum?

UK REFERENDUM Why there needs to be a 2 nd referendum? 1 st reason Turnover was under 75%. It was 72%. 2 nd reason It was not a clear choice. It was 52% not no argument 80% or 70% or 67.2% that was in 1975, that should represent broad majority of people with a clear choice. 3 rd reason Biased. It did not reflect the population. It did not reflect London, Scotland and Northern Ireland. It reflected only some part of the Country, and some part of the working population. I did not see scores of London reflected in this referendum. London, the beacon, the power house of United Kingdom was not reflected in the Referendum. Purely based on this reason can be enough. Results look as if it biased and if a survey, study or test resulted similar outcome it would be discarded. 4 th reason Naivety. It is not as important as the ones but there was naivety in the public. This public had no experience of a referendum before since 1975, that’s a generation long gap. And ...