Skip to main content

Question: Is Religion what causes the economic trouble in the Middle East?

The Question is naïve and too wrong also too simple. When I was child I did ask that question to myself too but I was naïve back then.

The Question hides an assumption that once we get rid of religion economic troubles would be over. I explain how wrong that would be never mind Stalin’s historical lessons of it.

They are powers in every Country. We need to be careful not to concentrate all the powers in one area. Some countries Religion has all the power, some military has it all. I’m not saying religion or military should not have any powers but I’m saying they shouldn’t have all of the powers. Even democratic government should not have all of the powers.

Yes, Country can be economically healthy and religious as long as power distribution structures are in place. Government becomes a collaborator of powers. Government may have the most shares of the powers but not at all of the powers. This way the Government can be religious or military and still be economically healthy.

A country which has a religious government not based on democracy can also be economically healthy. As long as the religion does not becomes the sole power.

So, what made Middle East countries so that religion seems to have all of the powers?
In these countries they are no power structures so religion feels the vacuum.

What power structures am I talking about other than military, religion or government?
Regional areas in the country shares some of the government power we call them councils. Power given to each council could be ability to raise the standard of the national curriculum in their schools or make their own local laws, make their own tax schemes if approved by the central government.

This relieves the burden placed on the central government and actually makes the government more efficient because now local councils do most of the work for their area.

Scientist, teachers, workers and students even parents can their powers too.
In the Middles East everything is expected from the Central government, one man or one religion. Only they can pass laws, reduce employment, open factories, help to establish companies, put out incentives to invest, promote gender equality…etc. This make the machine we call government really slow to run.

What I think needs to be done is not accuse religion and blame it on it but to put in power structures into those countries so the vacuum disappears. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

USEFUL WEBSITES WHEN LOOKING FOR JOBS

General Citycalling.com   Indeed.co.uk/jobs Jobsite.co.uk Totaljobs.com Jobs.theguardian.com Reed.co.uk/jobs Gumtree.com/jobs Fish4.co.uk Monster.co.uk Jobs.telegraph.co.uk cv-library.co.uk glassdoor.co.uk/job brightrecruits.com/tiptop quintcareers.com/general-job-sites jobs.vivastreet.co.uk/careers jobs.trovit.co.uk jobs.independent.co.uk uk.jobrapido.com gigajob.com/en-gb jobisjob.co.uk jobstoday.co.uk myjobhelper.co.uk stepstone.com londonjobs.metro.co.uk Londonjobs.co.uk Accounting and Auditing Accountancyagejobs.com Hays.co.uk/job/accountancy-finance-jobs Myaccountancyjobs.com Morganmckinley.co.uk/accounting-jobs Efinancialcareers.co.uk Icaewjobs.com Topfinancialjobs.co.uk Badenochandclark.com Roberthalf.co.uk Michaelpage.co.uk/browse/jobs/accounting/all/all Robertwalters.co.uk/accounting&finance.html Gaapweb.com Jobs4a.com Administrative and Office ...

Why there should be a 2nd referendum?

UK REFERENDUM Why there needs to be a 2 nd referendum? 1 st reason Turnover was under 75%. It was 72%. 2 nd reason It was not a clear choice. It was 52% not no argument 80% or 70% or 67.2% that was in 1975, that should represent broad majority of people with a clear choice. 3 rd reason Biased. It did not reflect the population. It did not reflect London, Scotland and Northern Ireland. It reflected only some part of the Country, and some part of the working population. I did not see scores of London reflected in this referendum. London, the beacon, the power house of United Kingdom was not reflected in the Referendum. Purely based on this reason can be enough. Results look as if it biased and if a survey, study or test resulted similar outcome it would be discarded. 4 th reason Naivety. It is not as important as the ones but there was naivety in the public. This public had no experience of a referendum before since 1975, that’s a generation long gap. And ...
NATO Cyber Alliance (NATOC) - A New Threat in our Global World - These days, there are many means to attack a country, whether by militarily, politically, indiscriminately, financially and the new threat on Cyberspace. Any kind of attack on another country should still be considered as an attack and responded in same manner. A country should be able to defend itself in any form of threat. Biggest cyber threat today coming from regimes such as N. Korea and current Russia regime and what country there will be in the future. We had seen them attacking emails, secret conversation, meddling democracy, creating fake accounts, stealing virtual documents. These are all cyber attacks and should be defined as, especially if sponsored by a Government. At the moment the West doesn't have protection to counter-act that. There will be many forms of cyber attack in the future. Most our lives are more and more reliant on cyberspace, whether shopping, banking, diagnosing, secret conversat...