Skip to main content

SOLUTION FOR LIBYA

SOLUTION FOR LIBYA


It was all going good for Libya right until 2014. Why these regions had to be in a mess? Why can't we get strong, peaceful, advancing, engaging, whole Libya? Why is that so difficult to get? The reason they fight over wouldn't fill a cup. The reasons they should co-operating would be infinite.


Or maybe someone wants a Messy Libya?
Is it their best interest to see messy Libya? It is not. It is not no countries best interest to see messy Libya. It's better for them peaceful, cooperating & whole Libya, next to Egypt. Opposite Italy. No migration will cross to Europe this way. It's better for Europe too.


So I ask, why Egypt support Khalifa Haftar? Why did France supports Khalifa Haftar? A dictator, an illegal occupier. Is he not. Of course he is. I do understand Russian support for him. Because Russian seem to support exactly the opposite of correct. But isn't France stand for peace, democracy, unity? Because they want a messy Libya? France should never associate themselves supporting such man as Haftar. It is a minus score for France.


So, what awaits for Libya? Will be ever get a peaceful, whole Libya? Not very likely. The World not seems to get agreement on anything these days. Look at Cyprus, still not agreement over 30 years, Syria fighting over 10 years, Israel vs Palestinians going on over 50 years, Somalia still not in whole. Libya will still continue existing. You think opposing forces would ever agree what's best for Libya? GNA, LNA will still continue fighting 10, 20 years from now. Once you broke the country, it remains broken, once you broke a vase you can't put it back. Won't expect becoming the whole again. The hope will be that less and less fighting, not turning into a second Syria or a Somalia at least. Because I know, GNA and LNA will continue and will never agree on anything with or without the support of other countries. That's what we do these day, we do not agree. We do what is the worst and harmful for us, is to fight. Ceasefire will establish here and there, fighting still continue for decays here and there, GNA advancing then LAN retaking, will go on on and on.... Solution is powerful USA, China, Russia takes over the country and run the country for a lease period without self. If France or Turkey would take over Libya, they do not have enough power for disagreements to disappear.


A new organisation needed.
Since the World can not agree on anything. We establish a new organisation, called White Army. If a trouble occurs in a Country it takes over the Country. It takes over Somalia, Libya until threat is gone. UN supposed to that job. But UN taking too long to resolve things. UN does nothing today in Myanmar. UN did nothing in Cambodia against communist atrocities. No UN role in Yugoslavia. Why I ask, because it too much a job for UN. UN already too busy maintains its role. UN is all over the World right now. UN is staying in Chile, Sudan longer than necessary for example, unable to attend to other things. So there is too much a need for World for UN to handle. If something to happen once in 30 years that was fine. But in the last 30 years along UN needed in Chile, Sudan, Cyprus, Israel, Somalia, Rwanda, Yugoslavia...UN also does not have enough powers. We need an organisation that message to the rest of the World that peace is a priority, or else we take over your Country and run it for you until threat is gone and peace is maintained. The organisation makes the peaceful rules get rid off the rules that are dividing. Establish laws and regulations that benefit the country with the help of the people. Put the country to a track that leads to strong, unity, scientific advancing and developing ways. When the job is done that the country can run on its own without help or signed agreement expires or lease expires. Gives the country back to their original owners. This may take 30 years to complete. So even this organisation won't have man power to attend all over the World. So there must be other ways also to prevent even before it occurs. Such as strong condemnations, warnings, incentives for good behaviour but blockade is no good. I call this new organisation the WHITE ARMY! All of their uniform made out of White clothes. And headquarters are in the most troubled regions in Tel-Aviv or Gaza where it also has access to Sea.


Dictatorship might be the best thing for the Country

Why the World tries to get rid off Dictatorship in some countries. Look at what was Gaddafi, a dictator to western standard. But Dictatorship might be the best thing for some countries. Iraq was is a mess right now. Maybe Saddam what the best thing possible for the Country. So i thing getting rid off dictatorship and putting democracy might not be the best. The country will turn into democracy maybe in the future, you just wait and see. Gaddafi was a dictator but was doing good democratic things for the country. He was a dictator, but for Libya he was the most democratic leader, and much richer citizens. But look at Libya now, do you prefer then or now?

So I think, the West should not try to eliminate dictatorships unless they become threat to peace, instead try to incentive the leaders to reform their country, so that the country gets better and better every day. The harm of dictatorship will be less and less. I think turning Iraq, Libya into democracy by force would not be the best approach. Democracy yes, but less and less form of dictatorship than helpfully to democracy, or the least form of dictatorships.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

USEFUL WEBSITES WHEN LOOKING FOR JOBS

General Citycalling.com   Indeed.co.uk/jobs Jobsite.co.uk Totaljobs.com Jobs.theguardian.com Reed.co.uk/jobs Gumtree.com/jobs Fish4.co.uk Monster.co.uk Jobs.telegraph.co.uk cv-library.co.uk glassdoor.co.uk/job brightrecruits.com/tiptop quintcareers.com/general-job-sites jobs.vivastreet.co.uk/careers jobs.trovit.co.uk jobs.independent.co.uk uk.jobrapido.com gigajob.com/en-gb jobisjob.co.uk jobstoday.co.uk myjobhelper.co.uk stepstone.com londonjobs.metro.co.uk Londonjobs.co.uk Accounting and Auditing Accountancyagejobs.com Hays.co.uk/job/accountancy-finance-jobs Myaccountancyjobs.com Morganmckinley.co.uk/accounting-jobs Efinancialcareers.co.uk Icaewjobs.com Topfinancialjobs.co.uk Badenochandclark.com Roberthalf.co.uk Michaelpage.co.uk/browse/jobs/accounting/all/all Robertwalters.co.uk/accounting&finance.html Gaapweb.com Jobs4a.com Administrative and Office ...

Why there should be a 2nd referendum?

UK REFERENDUM Why there needs to be a 2 nd referendum? 1 st reason Turnover was under 75%. It was 72%. 2 nd reason It was not a clear choice. It was 52% not no argument 80% or 70% or 67.2% that was in 1975, that should represent broad majority of people with a clear choice. 3 rd reason Biased. It did not reflect the population. It did not reflect London, Scotland and Northern Ireland. It reflected only some part of the Country, and some part of the working population. I did not see scores of London reflected in this referendum. London, the beacon, the power house of United Kingdom was not reflected in the Referendum. Purely based on this reason can be enough. Results look as if it biased and if a survey, study or test resulted similar outcome it would be discarded. 4 th reason Naivety. It is not as important as the ones but there was naivety in the public. This public had no experience of a referendum before since 1975, that’s a generation long gap. And ...
NATO Cyber Alliance (NATOC) - A New Threat in our Global World - These days, there are many means to attack a country, whether by militarily, politically, indiscriminately, financially and the new threat on Cyberspace. Any kind of attack on another country should still be considered as an attack and responded in same manner. A country should be able to defend itself in any form of threat. Biggest cyber threat today coming from regimes such as N. Korea and current Russia regime and what country there will be in the future. We had seen them attacking emails, secret conversation, meddling democracy, creating fake accounts, stealing virtual documents. These are all cyber attacks and should be defined as, especially if sponsored by a Government. At the moment the West doesn't have protection to counter-act that. There will be many forms of cyber attack in the future. Most our lives are more and more reliant on cyberspace, whether shopping, banking, diagnosing, secret conversat...