Skip to main content

WORLD LANGUAGE COUNCIL (W.C.L)

WORLD LANGUAGE COUNCIL (W.C.L)
'Uniting the World through Language'


Nationalities? Religion? Beliefs that divide and create hatred among humans. Have they achieved connecting and uniting humans? Or maybe we give them too much attentions than we should.


I Believe in Humanity!


This is the belief! We will work towards connecting all humans, they will share common things. The big picture is not bettering some nationalities, some belief system but making all human better and language plays a big role in that. But again how?


Not one nations language but language common to all nations!


English is will be chosen as the base of World language as it is already established well enough but it will have words from every language going forward.

One of World Language Council's responsibilities is to give direction to the evolution of the world language. In a way 50-100 years looking into the future World Language spoken, will be slightly differ then the English spoken in that nations language.


When something new invented, such as hypersonic technology, it is invented in Russia, so why do we use English word for it especially when we are trying to establish a world language? We will use 'giperzvukovaya' or short 'giperzvukova' or 'giper' or maybe 'yiper', words that sync with established language a bit better. We do not want world language looking like a mess. One of World Language Council's responsible is make new words flow with the rest of the language. We want it to have some influence from every nation, it is not representative of a nation, it is representative of every nation on earth.


WCL(World Council of Languages) or WLC(World Language Council) whatever the name they decide, decides what words to add, it make sure it consists from all the languages of the world. It can only add limited words per year as to nudge the direction of evolution to the language towards world language not English. It also responsible accrediting language certificates, it will be a requirement for most institutions who do servicing in the language.


WCL also goes backward, for example if India is not inventing anything new, or the language does not have enough words from a nation. WCL also can decide to change previous words in the language. For example when it comes to India, spice really associated with that country. Why do we call the word 'spice' let's call 'masaala', or 'masala' to make it more sync?


WCL is a body, consists of language experts from nations around the world, makes yearly conferences all around the world, it updates new words yearly and publishes on its website and has a dictionary published yearly.






Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

USEFUL WEBSITES WHEN LOOKING FOR JOBS

General Citycalling.com   Indeed.co.uk/jobs Jobsite.co.uk Totaljobs.com Jobs.theguardian.com Reed.co.uk/jobs Gumtree.com/jobs Fish4.co.uk Monster.co.uk Jobs.telegraph.co.uk cv-library.co.uk glassdoor.co.uk/job brightrecruits.com/tiptop quintcareers.com/general-job-sites jobs.vivastreet.co.uk/careers jobs.trovit.co.uk jobs.independent.co.uk uk.jobrapido.com gigajob.com/en-gb jobisjob.co.uk jobstoday.co.uk myjobhelper.co.uk stepstone.com londonjobs.metro.co.uk Londonjobs.co.uk Accounting and Auditing Accountancyagejobs.com Hays.co.uk/job/accountancy-finance-jobs Myaccountancyjobs.com Morganmckinley.co.uk/accounting-jobs Efinancialcareers.co.uk Icaewjobs.com Topfinancialjobs.co.uk Badenochandclark.com Roberthalf.co.uk Michaelpage.co.uk/browse/jobs/accounting/all/all Robertwalters.co.uk/accounting&finance.html Gaapweb.com Jobs4a.com Administrative and Office ...
2 comments
Read more

Why there should be a 2nd referendum?

UK REFERENDUM Why there needs to be a 2 nd referendum? 1 st reason Turnover was under 75%. It was 72%. 2 nd reason It was not a clear choice. It was 52% not no argument 80% or 70% or 67.2% that was in 1975, that should represent broad majority of people with a clear choice. 3 rd reason Biased. It did not reflect the population. It did not reflect London, Scotland and Northern Ireland. It reflected only some part of the Country, and some part of the working population. I did not see scores of London reflected in this referendum. London, the beacon, the power house of United Kingdom was not reflected in the Referendum. Purely based on this reason can be enough. Results look as if it biased and if a survey, study or test resulted similar outcome it would be discarded. 4 th reason Naivety. It is not as important as the ones but there was naivety in the public. This public had no experience of a referendum before since 1975, that’s a generation long gap. And ...
Post a Comment
Read more
NATO Cyber Alliance (NATOC) - A New Threat in our Global World - These days, there are many means to attack a country, whether by militarily, politically, indiscriminately, financially and the new threat on Cyberspace. Any kind of attack on another country should still be considered as an attack and responded in same manner. A country should be able to defend itself in any form of threat. Biggest cyber threat today coming from regimes such as N. Korea and current Russia regime and what country there will be in the future. We had seen them attacking emails, secret conversation, meddling democracy, creating fake accounts, stealing virtual documents. These are all cyber attacks and should be defined as, especially if sponsored by a Government. At the moment the West doesn't have protection to counter-act that. There will be many forms of cyber attack in the future. Most our lives are more and more reliant on cyberspace, whether shopping, banking, diagnosing, secret conversat...
Post a Comment
Read more